AMD Athlon II X4 620 CPU Review

October 26, 2009 | 09:33

Tags: #28ghz #45nm #620 #95w #athlon #benchmarks #cheap #core #cpu #four #ii #oc #overclock #perform #performance #processor #quad #review #x4

Companies: #amd #test

Cinebench R10 64-bit

Download from: www.maxon.net

Cinebench R10 uses Maxon's Cinema 4D engine to render a photo-realistic scene of a shiny motorbike. The scene is highly complex, with reflections, ambient occlusion and procedural shaders so it gives a CPU a tough workout.

The test can be in run in single-threaded 1CPU mode or multi-threaded xCPU mode - just click the respective button. In this way, Cinebench R10 is useful for gauging the performance of each execution core of a CPU, as well as its overall performance.

As Cinema 4D is a real-world application - used on films such as Spider-Man, Star Wars among others - Cinebench R10 can be viewed as a real-world benchmark.

AMD Athlon II X4 620 CPU Review Real World Performance - Cinebench R10 AMD Athlon II X4 620 CPU Review Real World Performance - Cinebench R10

Cinebench 10

x64 Version - xCPU, 800x600 Image

  • Athlon II X4 620 (4x3.5GHz, 2.45GHz NB, 2.2GHz HTT)
  • Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x3.5GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X4 620 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x4.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB)
  • Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x2.8GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.8GHz, 2.6GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x2.8GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • 13228
  • 10853
  • 10068
  • 8896
  • 8684
  • 8335
  • 6918
  • 6378
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
15000
Score - higher is better

Cinebench 10: L3 Cache Test

x64 Version - xCPU, 800x600 Image

  • Phenom II X4 6MB L3 Cache (4x2.6GHz, 2.0Ghz NB)
  • Athlon II X4 620 0MB L3 Cache (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz NB)
  • 10913
  • 10068
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
Score - higher is better

Naturally, the four cores work to the benefit of the Athlon II X4 here as it clearly makes a positive impression on the table for the same cost. The deficit to a full-fat Phenom II X4 is only about eight per cent too - not that much, despite the heavy multi-threading, although we suspect the amount of inter-cache snooping that benefits having a L3 cache is limited because each thread works on a completely independent part of the scene.

Cinebench 10

x64 Version - 1 CPU, 800x600 Image

  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x4.2GHz, 1,600MHz FSB)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x3.5GHz, 2.4GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X4 620 (4x3.5GHz, 2.45GHz NB, 2.2GHz HTT)
  • Phenom II X2 550 BE (2x3.1GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Core 2 Duo E7400 (2x2.8GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
  • Phenom II X3 720 BE (3x2.8GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • Athlon II X4 620 (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz NB, 2.0GHz HTT)
  • 5056
  • 4372
  • 4020
  • 3739
  • 3599
  • 3408
  • 3273
  • 2812
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Score - higher is better

Cinebench 10: L3 Cache Test

x64 Version - 1 CPU, 800x600 Image

  • Phenom II X4 6MB L3 Cache (4x2.6GHz, 2.0Ghz NB)
  • Athlon II X4 620 0MB L3 Cache (4x2.6GHz, 2.0GHz NB)
  • 3016
  • 2812
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Score - higher is better

Single core performance is naturally a lot lower since the clock speed is more limited compared to the similarly priced competition. The difference between the Athlon and same clocked Phenom also remains in the same margin at seven per cent.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04